There is no presumption that a doctor possesses the required skill and knowledge required of him by the controlling medical standards and that in treating his patients, that he applies that knowledge and skill. Williams v. Golden, 95-2712 (La. App. 4 Cir. 7/23/97), 699 So.2d 102, 106-07, writ denied, 1997-2788 (La. 1/30/98), 709 So.2d 708.
Where medical disciplines overlap, a specialist in one field may give expert testimony as to the standard of care applicable to areas of the practice of medicine common to both disciplines. Corley v. State, DHH, 32,613 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/30/99), 749 So.2d 926, 931-32, citing Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), 643 So.2d 1236; Richardson v. State, 98-918 (La.App. 3 Cir.12/09/98), 726 So.2d 417; Kippers v. Corcoran, 97-870 (La.App. 5 Cir.01/27/98), 707 So.2d 463; Smith v. Juneau, 95-0724 (La.App. 4 Cir.04/09/97), 692 So.2d 1365; and Ricker v. Hebert, 94-1743 (La.App. 1 Cir.05/05/95), 655 So.2d 493.
In Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Company, 2010-0703 (La. 1/28/2011), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that an “automobile business” exclusion in a Farm Bureau insurance policy violates Louisiana’s public policy of requiring insurance coverage as expressed in the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Law, La. R.S.32:851 – 1043. Specifically, the Court found that the “automobile business” exclusion conflicts with the “statutory omnibus clause” contained in La.R.S. 32:900(B)(2), which requires coverage for all permissive drivers.
See also Marcus v. Hanover Insurance Company, 1998-2040 (La. 6/4/99), 740 So.2d 603, 606, wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court struck down a “business use” exclusion as being in direct conflict with the statutory omnibus clause.
Continue reading
In a medical negligence claim against a Louisiana doctor practicing in a specific specialty, the plaintiff has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) the degree of knowledge or skill possessed, or the degree of care ordinarily exercised by physicians licensed to practice and actively practicing in the same medical specialty as the defendant doctor; (2) that the defendant doctor either lacked this degree of knowledge or skill or failed to use reasonable care or diligence, along with his best judgment in the exercise of that skill; and (3) that, as a proximate result of this lack of knowledge or skill, or failure to exercise this degree of care, the patient suffered injuries which would not otherwise have been incurred. La.R.S. 9:2794.
In Louisiana, “[t]o establish a claim for medical malpractice, a plaintiff must prove, by a preponderance of the evidence: (1) the standard of care applicable to the defendant; (2) the defendant breached that standard of care; and (3) there was a causal connection between the breach and the resulting injury. La. Rev. Stat. 9:2794.2.
Expert testimony is generally required to establish the applicable standard of care and whether or not that standard was breached, except where the negligence is so obvious that a lay person can infer negligence without the guidance of expert testimony. ***
In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, we are not free to simply disregard the … unopposed expert medical evidence.”
Schultz v. Guoth, 2010-0343 (La. 1/19/01), citing Samaha v. Rau, 07-1726 (La. 2/26/08), 977 So.2d 880, 883, and Pfiffner v.Correa, 94-0924 (La. 10/17/94), 643 So.2d 1228.
Based on the foregoing, the Louisiana Supreme Court reversed the lower courts and granted summary judgment in favor of a defendant obstetrician who offered a unanimous medical review panel opinion in his favor and an affidavit of one the medical review panel members in support of his motion. The plaintiff, whose baby was still born allegedly as a result of the medical malpractice, produced no expert testimony or counter-affidavit.
Continue reading
A plaintiff in a medical negligence case must present his claim first to a medical review panel of physicians of the same specialty as the defendant physician and licensed to practice in Louisiana. Physicians from other states or from different specialties can not be appointed to a medical review panel. The panel evaluates the evidence submitted and renders a non-binding opinion. The opinion of the panel has been admitted into evidence in this case. The jury may consider it along with all of the other evidence in the case on this issue, but its findings are not binding on the parties or on the jury. Like any other evidence, it may be evaluated for bias when you determine the weight you may give, if any, to the opinion. La. R.S. 40:1299.47(C) & (H); and Derouen v. Kolb, 397 So.2d 791, 794 (La. 1981).
On January 6, 2011, Chief Justice Catherine D. “Kitty” Kimball announced that the Louisiana Supreme Court has appointed the following five members to sit on the newly established Committee to Study Plain Civil Jury Instructions:
-Committee Chairman: H. Alston Johnson, III, Phelps Dunbar law firm
-Judge James E. Stewart, Second Circuit Court of Appeal
The Louisiana legislature has created an extensive statutory scheme governing medical negligence claims brought against doctors who qualify as “health care providers” under the statute. Two primary features of this scheme are: (1) the mandatory submission of all claims to a medical review panel prior to any suit being filed, and (2) a limitation of $500,000 on the total amount of general damages and lost wages that can be recovered. LaMark v. NME Hospitals, Inc., 522 So.2d 634, 635 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 526 So.2d 803 (La.1988).
I recently purchased a Harley Davidson Soft-Tail Fat Boy motorcycle, and was quick to purchase a DOT compliant helmet because motorcycle accidents are a leading cause of head injuries and because helmets save lives. In fact, NHTSA “estimates that helmets saved 1,829 lives in 2008, and that 823 more could have been saved if all motorcyclists had worn helmets.” Of the 5,290 motorcyclist who were killed in the United States in 2008, 76 were in Louisiana, with 41% of the dead motorcyclists not wearing a helmet. Don’t be a statistic. Wear a helmet.
Shortly before midnight on January 6, 2011, a 65 year old California man was struck by an 18 Wheeler on Interstate 20 in Bienville Parish, Louisiana, as he exited the driver’s side of his parked vehicle.
Parking on the shoulder of a busy highway is extremely dangerous and should be avoided unless there is a serious emergency and parking on the shoulder is unavoidable. In that instance, one should consider exiting the vehicle on the side away from the highway to avoid walking into the path of another vehicle.
Continue reading
Louisiana Injury Lawyer Blog
